S.J.D. v. Mentor Corp.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, P.J.
S.J.D. appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his claim for negligent manufacture of a prosthetic device on the grounds that the claim was barred by the three-year statute of limitations set forth in sec. 893.54, Stats. The sole issue on appeal is whether SJ.D.'s cause of action accrued when a doctor advised him to have the device surgically removed or, some sixty days later, when the same doctor inspected the device during surgery. Based on our review of the record in this case, we determine that there are no material facts in dispute and that the trial court erred in determining that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Borello v. U.S. Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Fritz v. McGrathCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Jenson v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Milbrandt v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doe v. American National Red CrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Manu-Tronics, Inc. v. Effective Management Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Harwell v. American Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1992
- John Doe and Jane Doe v. American National Red Cross, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Nester v. Biomet IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.