Legal Opinion
United States v. Harmon
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided October 23, 1998No. 2:98-cv-00169PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
McBRYDE, District Judge.
On October 16, 1998, defendant, D’RON LAMAR HARMON, (“Harmon”) filed motions (1) for substitution of counsel, (2) to extend time for filing motion to recuse, (3) to extend time for filing motion to suppress, (4) to suppress, and (5) to recuse. The court, having considered the motions, the responses of United States of America, the record, and applicable authorities, concludes that the first three motions should be granted; that the motion to suppress should be set for hearing; and that the motion to recuse should be denied.
I
Background
On…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. Cooley Ronald L. Taylor Gary P. Leber Merri W. Turner, Also Known as Merrie Foutz and Charles W. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- The Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana v. Harry L. Laws Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Terry Lynn Nichols v. Wayne E. Alley, District Judge, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K., Tokyo v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hinman v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. RhodesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
- Waters v. Day & Zimmermann NPS, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020