Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 1, 1991No. 1641PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

This is a murder case. Appellant James David Smith argues that the trial judge erred in charging the jury. The State argues that any error is harmless. We reverse and remand.

The defendant went to the S & J Lounge in the company of the Cook brothers, Ronnie and Steve. Unsurprisingly, beer was the beverage of choice. According to the defendant, “there was a lot of drinking going on.” Predictably, hostilities broke out. The Marquis of Queensberry rules were not in effect.

The defendant testified he left the lounge immediately after the Cooks and, when he got outside, he “saw…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. FullerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. GallmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. State v. McCaskillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Smith v. Safeco Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HuckabeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Sauers v. Poulin Bros. Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. CampenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API