Legal Opinion

Spivey v. Pope

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 17, 1935No. 10665PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. Where in a suit for injunction the evidence introduced at the interlocutory hearing consisted only of the original petition and the defendant’s answer, which considered together presented an issue of fact as to the truth of the allegations made by the plaintiff as basis for the relief sought, the presiding judge was not bound to grant an interlocutory injunction, and his judgment refusing the same will not be disturbed by this court. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co. v. Chapman, 173 Ga. 633 (160 S. E. 783) ; Sapp v. Ritch, 169 Ga. 33 (2) (149 S. E. 636).

2. In a suit for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sapp v. RitchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Wardlaw v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Volunteer State Life Insurance v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. GunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Pritchett v. PayneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API