Cleveland v. Schwaemmle
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtQtjillian, J.
1. Special grounds 1 and 2 of the amended mo tion for new trial assign as error the following charge: “Gentlemen, if you find this contract to be as contended by the plaintiff, and as expressed in his petition, as amended, then you should go no further, for in that event, the plaintiff would be entitled to recover the amount sued for, since the measures of recovery, if you find the contract to be as plaintiff contends it to be, are fixed by that contract, and the court and jury would be bound by the measure of damages plead, provided, you find that the plaintiff’s version of the contract be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Broxton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Dolan v. LifseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Hill v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Bennett v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Burns v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark's Super Gas, Inc. v. Tri-State Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Toole v. Brownlow & Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Williams v. CLAUSSEN-LAWRENCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Georgia Power Company v. NixCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978