Legal Opinion

(PC) Choyce v. Oliveria

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 4, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01216Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BENJAMIN CHOYCE, No. 2:19-cv-1216 TLN DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 M. OLIVERIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This 19 proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915(a).…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Ramirez v. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API