Legal Opinion

Priboth v. Chism

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1917No. 8188PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Tillman County ; T. P. Clay, Assigned Judge. Action by' E. G. Priboth against B. AV. Chism and others on a bond. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BURFORD, 0.

E. C. Priboth sued B. AA?\ Chism for the recovery of certain rents and caused an attachment to issue. Chism thereupon gave a bond with his codefendants as sureties to dissolve the attachment. The bond was conditioned to perform the judgment of the court. Priboth recovered judgment for the sum of $443.88 and $54.55 costs. Thereafter he commenced the present action on the bond. Defendants answered, setting up, in effect, payment. Prom their pleading and proof it appears that one Orna A. Haverson had recovered a large judgment in the district court of Tillman county against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co. v. HydeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Keith v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API