Legal Opinion

Cabinet Mountains Wilderness v. Peterson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 15, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-2450PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GESELL, District Judge.

This case involves a challenge to a decision by the United States Forest Service approving a mineral exploration program by a private company, ASARCO, in the Cabinet Mountains Wilderness area of northwest Montana. The matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiffs, the defendants, and intervenor ASARCO. The issues have been exhaustively briefed and oral argument has been heard.

The positions of the parties can be stated fairly succinctly. The plaintiffs assert that the exploratory drilling area is inhabited by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cayman Turtle Farm, Ltd. v. AndrusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  2. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. MartinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cabinet Mountains Wilderness/scotchman's Peak Grizzly Bears v. R. Max Peterson, U. S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  2. Friends of Endangered Species, Inc. v. JantzenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Friends Of Endangered Species, Inc. v. JantzenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Sierra Club v. BabbittDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1999
  5. Friends of Endangered Species, Inc. v. JantzenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API