Legal Opinion

National Athletic Trainers' Ass'n v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 3, 2006No. 05-11320PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:

Appellant National Athletic Trainers’ Association, Inc. (“NATA”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its suit for injunctive and declaratory relief for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. NATA brought suit challenging the Secretary of *502Health and Human Services’s (“the Secretary”) implementation of a new rule under the Medicare regulations providing that therapy services administered by athletic trainers incident to physicians’ services are no longer reimbursable under Medicare Part B. The district court concluded that NATA has standing to challenge…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Physician Hospitals of America v. KathleenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. McKinley v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. Bradley v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. United States v. $500,000.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Southwest Pharmacy Solutions, Inc. v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API