Legal Opinion
Apex Geoscience, Inc. v. Arden Texarkana, LLC, Dornoch Texarkana, LLC, RP Texarkana, LLC, Texarkana Rancho, LLC, and Narden Texarkana, LLC
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided June 19, 2012No. 06-11-00128-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Chief Justice MORRISS.
The parking lot of the Texarkana Pavilion shopping center experienced problems. It was alleged that the necessary groundwork was not done to support the paving. Ultimately, in the lawsuit that arose from the problems, Apex Geoscience, Inc. (Apex), was joined as a third-party defen*16dant. Apex seeks1 a dismissal of the lawsuit against it, because the necessary paperwork was not done to support the third-party claims against Apex. We agree.
Texarkana Pavilion, L.P. (Pavilion) purchased and began developing 27.606 acres of land as a retail shopping center.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. SummersTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Spradlin v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Jones v. FowlerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crosstex Energy Services, L.P. v. Pro Plus, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
- Texas Southern University v. Kirksey Architects, Inc. Paradigm Consultants, Inc. Nathelyne Kennedy & Associates, L.P. F/K/A Nathelyne Kennedy & Associates L.P. And Haynes Whaley Associates Inc. Structural Engineering, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
- Bhp Engineering and Construction, L.P. v. Heil Construction Management, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
- DHM Design v. Catherine Morzak, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015