Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Ziegler

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2007No. 05-30177Published

1DissentW. Fletcher, Circuit Judge

by PREGERSON, REINHARDT, KOZINSKI, HAWKINS, THOMAS, McKEOWN, WARDLAW, FISHER, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges:

For two reasons, I dissent from the court’s decision not to rehear this case en banc.

*893First, the employer in this case had an announced policy that employee computer use was subject to electronic monitoring from outside the employees’ offices by the employer. The panel incorrectly concludes that this policy constituted express authorization by the employees for the employer to do something quite different — to consent to a warrantless physical entry into the employees’ locked offices…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. ShaibuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API