Daniel v. Clark
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Justice.
This is a suit on a promissory note brought by appellee against the appellants. From a judgment for the appellee, appellants have appealed. Both parties requested findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court adopted all of such requests made by the appellee and a portion of those made by appellants. Among the latter was requested finding of fact No. 5, which reads as follows: “That the defendant never paid out his contract on lots 1, 2 and 3 in Block 18 of the original Town of Hobbs, Lea County, State of New Mexico, and never has owned the same, and said pavement was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Artificial Ice Co. v. Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Hartley v. . Eagle Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Apodaca v. LuerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- La Luz Community Ditch Co. v. Town of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- Baker v. De ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bounds v. CarnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Neal v. Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Field's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941