Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Clark

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1935No. 4058PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Justice.

This is a suit on a promissory note brought by appellee against the appellants. From a judgment for the appellee, appellants have appealed. Both parties requested findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court adopted all of such requests made by the appellee and a portion of those made by appellants. Among the latter was requested finding of fact No. 5, which reads as follows: “That the defendant never paid out his contract on lots 1, 2 and 3 in Block 18 of the original Town of Hobbs, Lea County, State of New Mexico, and never has owned the same, and said pavement was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Artificial Ice Co. v. Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Hartley v. . Eagle Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Apodaca v. LuerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. La Luz Community Ditch Co. v. Town of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Baker v. De ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bounds v. CarnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Neal v. Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In Re Field's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API