Warden v. Magnus
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Roy Warden, No. CV-18-00096-TUC-LCK 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Chris Magnus, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ two motions to dismiss (Docs. 63, 74) 16 and two motions for judicial notice (Docs. 64, 71). The motions to dismiss are fully 17 briefed. (Docs. 69, 72, 80, 81.) Plaintiff did not file a response to the requests for judicial 18 notice. After oral argument on March 5, 2020, the Court took the motions under 19 advisement. (Doc. 84.) Defendants filed a supplemental…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.