Legal Opinion
Fralix v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided January 21, 2025No. 5:24-cv-00146Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION AMBER FRALIX PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:24-cv-146-BJB COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CABINET DEFENDANTS FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES et al. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, Amber Fralix, unrepresented by counsel, filed a civil rights Complaint under
42 U.S.C. §§ 1983
and 1985. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court must undertake a preliminary review of the Complaint (DN 1).1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e); McGore v. Wrigglesworth,
114 F.3d 601, 608
(6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Boag v. MacDougallSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Freddie Sevier v. Kenneth TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.