Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Oakey v. Fowler

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 22, 1895PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Quo warranto to determine the title of the defendant to the office of collector of city taxes of the city of Hartford, brought to the Superior Court for Hartford County, and tried to the court, Hall, J.; facts found and case reserved for the advice of this court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, C. J.

This is an information in the nature of a quo warranto, made to the Superior Court in Hartford County by the State’s Attorney in that county, at the relation of P. Davis Oakey, a resident and freeman of the town and city of Hartford. It alleges that the relator is the lawfully elected and qualified collector of taxes in the city of Hartford, and charges that notwithstanding his said election and qualification, since the 7th day of December, 1894, George W. Fowler of said town and city, and continuously hitherto, without legal warrant, claim, or right, has used and exercised, and still does…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morris v. BulkeleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Schuet v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Searcy v. GrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Privett v. BickfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Kinyon v. DucheneMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Low v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Eberle v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  3. Civil Service Commission v. PekrulConnecticut Superior Court · 1989
  4. Meigs v. TheisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. State Ex Rel. Butera v. LombardiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API