Legal Opinion

Morsell v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 20, 1876No. 162PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeáx from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swathe

The question presented for our determination in this case is, whether a judgment at law is a lien upon real estate in the city of Washington, which, before the judgment was rendered, had been conveyed to trustees with a power of sale to secure the payment of the debts of the grantor described in the deed of trust.

The facts, so far as it is necessary to state them, are few and simple: —

On the 4th of November, 1867, the appellant, Morsell, executed a deed of trust to Flodoardo Howard to secure the payment of certain promissory notes held by the cestuis 'que trust, as set forth in the deed.

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. President of Bank of the Metropolis v. GuttschlickSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Lessee of Smith v. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Massingill v. DownsSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  4. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Van Ness v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 1839

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Curry v. LehmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co. v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Brandies v. CochraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. McMillan v. DavenportMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. United States v. HarpootlianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API