Legal Opinion
Mercy-Peninsula Ambulance, Inc. v. County of San Mateo
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 8, 1984No. C-84-1184-WWSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
SCHWARZER, District Judge.
This antitrust action concerns the provision by ambulance personnel of paramedic service, the highest level of pre-hospital emergency medical care, in the defendant County of San Mateo (“the County”). Defendants Medevac, Inc. (“Medevac”) and 911 Emergency Services, Inc. (“911”) provide primary emergency ambulance service for the County and defendant hospitals 1 through the County’s public dispatch lines; plaintiff provides “back-up” service when the primary providers cannot respond to a call. The gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- County of San Bernardino v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Mercy-Peninsula Ambulance, Inc. v. County of San MateoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Canister v. Emergency Ambulance Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Schaefer's Ambulance Service v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Bright v. Ogden CityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.