Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Shadle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1895No. 6422PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Custer county. Tried below before Holcomb, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This was an action by Bingham against Shadle and nine others, on an appeal undertaking in a case taken from a justice of the peace to the district court, the defendants being the sureties on the undertaking. The defense was that the bond was signed by each one under an agreement that all should sign, but that before approval the signatures of three of the defendants were erased, whereby it is claimed all were discharged. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The court found generally for the defendants, and then found specially that thi’ee of the defendants, before the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gorham v. SummersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  2. Medlin v. Platte CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1843
  3. Williams v. McConicoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. Asch v. WileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. McCloskey v. Indianapolis Manufacturers & Carpenters UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seng v. PayneNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Kamrath v. HodgesNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Worley v. EasleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gay v. FarleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Sumner v. SwinkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API