Legal Opinion

State v. Harenda Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 31, 2006No. 2005AP1829PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

¶ 1. Harenda Enterprises, Inc., appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the State of Wisconsin imposing environmental penalties and ancillary surcharges in connection with Harenda's inspection of asbestos at the Milwaukee Auditorium under a contract with the Wisconsin Center District's renovation of the Auditorium. See Wxs. Stat. § 285.87 (air-pollution penalties). The crux of this appeal turns on the language of the applicable federal regulation, adopted by the State, and whether Harenda's testing for asbestos contamination at what the trial court referred to in its order as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Orion Flight Services, Inc. v. Basler Flight ServiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Harenda Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Williams v. Integrated Community Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  3. Kriska v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  4. State v. Harenda Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. Harenda Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API