Legal Opinion

Employees' Retirement System v. Dorsey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 23, 2013No. 29PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

Baltimore City Code (2012), Article 22, § 9(j)1 lays out the eligibility requirements for certain employees of the City of Baltimore to receive line-of-duty disability retirement benefits.2 That section requires a claimant seeking such benefits to prove that he or she sustained at least a “50% anatomical loss of the use of any 1 or at least a 25% or more anatomical loss of each of 2 or more” enumerated body parts. § 9(j)(5)(ii), (iii). The loss of use must be

*104the direct result of bodily injury through an accident independent of all other causes and independent of any preexisting physical or…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Marzullo v. KahlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Donlon v. Montgomery Co. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Corp. v. Beebe-LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Balt. City Detention Ctr. v. FoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Geier v. Maryland State Board of PhysiciansCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API