Employees' Retirement System v. Dorsey
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.
Baltimore City Code (2012), Article 22, § 9(j)1 lays out the eligibility requirements for certain employees of the City of Baltimore to receive line-of-duty disability retirement benefits.2 That section requires a claimant seeking such benefits to prove that he or she sustained at least a “50% anatomical loss of the use of any 1 or at least a 25% or more anatomical loss of each of 2 or more” enumerated body parts. § 9(j)(5)(ii), (iii). The loss of use must be
*104the direct result of bodily injury through an accident independent of all other causes and independent of any preexisting physical or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Marzullo v. KahlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Donlon v. Montgomery Co. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Corp. v. Beebe-LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Balt. City Detention Ctr. v. FoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Geier v. Maryland State Board of PhysiciansCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.