Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Lloyds London
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 12, 1969No. Civ. 11944PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRegan, J.
This is an action for breach of a liability insurance contract. The trial court sustained the defendants ’ general demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend and plaintiff appeals from the subsequent judgment, contending:
The trial court erred in sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the complaint on the grounds that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action since the language' of the policy covers the injury to, and subsequent amputation of a portion of, plaintiff’s hand.
On October 22, 1965, plaintiff, while in the course of his employment 1 in Tulare…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Sheanon v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Sneck v. Travellers' InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Moore v. Ætna Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Neer v. Fireman's Fund American Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Suarez v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Reliance Insurance Company v. KinmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Farthing v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.