Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Howell

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 26, 2007No. 06-11652PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT E. NUGENT, Chief Bankruptcy Judge.

This case comes on for confirmation of the debtors’ amended Chapter 13 plan. 1 Under that plan, the debtors propose to dedicate their projected disposable income to the payment of their unsecured creditors for a period of 36 months. The trustee objects that the debtors are not devoting all of their projected disposable income to payment of unsecured creditors as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B). 2 Specifically, the trustee contends that debtors’ projected disposable income is too low as a result of the debtors’ deduction from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  2. In Re SlusherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  3. In Re McGuireUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006
  4. In Re FowlerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
  5. In Re HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ross-Tousey v. NearyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Ransom v. MBNA America Bank, N.A. (In Re Ransom)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Fokkena v. HartwickDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  4. Neary v. Ross-Tousey (In Re Ross-Tousey)District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
  5. Pearson v. Stewart (In Re Pearson)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API