Legal Opinion

Gill v. Porter

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 23, 1970No. 5-5133PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The question presented here is the location of the boundary between riparian owners on opposite sides of an abandoned river bed. Thechancellor fixed the boundary between the parties along a line equidistant from the north high bank and the south high bank. Appellants Leta Wright Gill, William H. Cook, Jr., Darra Jean Cook, William H. Cook, Sr. and Catherine Wright Cook appeal contending that the boundary should have been fixed along the thalweg or valley way of the river at the time it became non-navigable. Appellee Tennie Porter cross-appeals contending that appellants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Parker v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  3. Gill v. HedgecockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. McGee v. MatthewsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Porter v. Arkansas Western Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Dye v. Anderson Tully Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Swaim v. Stephens Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. River Land Co. v. McAlexanderCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API