Legal Opinion

Fun Fair Park, Inc. v. Gabor Holding Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCharles Margett, J.

The plaintiffs move to strike for legal insufficiency the first partial defense contained in the- answer to the supplemental complaint and the three defenses therein referred to as the second, third and fourth.complete defenses.

Preliminarily the defendants have raised the objection that William B. Klein, Esq., the attorney making this motion on behalf of all the plaintiffs, has no right or authority to do so on behalf of the plaintiff Frances Ursini since she has previously substituted him in this and other litigation to which she is party. Admittedly, no stipulation of substitution has been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Baxter v. . McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Didier v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fun Fair Park, Inc. v. Gabor Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API