Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Lacey

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2012No. DA 11-0193PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 John Lacey (Lacey) appeals his conviction for sexual intercourse without consent in the Eighteenth Judicial District, Gallatin County. We affirm. Lacey raises the following issues:

¶2 Did the prosecutor make multiple statements during her opening and closing statements to the jury that warrant this Court’s exercise of plain error review ?

¶3 Did the State impermissibly change its legal theory of how Lacey committed sexual intercourse without consent?

¶4 We recounted in detail the factual and procedural history of this matter in State v. Lacey, 2010 MT 6, ¶ 5, 355 Mont. 31, 224 P.3d 1247. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. Jeremiah GreenMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Clausell v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. AkerMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. W. LawrenceMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. Nevada R. UgaldeMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. W. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. TellegenMontana Supreme Court · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API