Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scott Partenfelder v. Steve Rohde

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2014No. 2012AP000597Published

1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.

¶ 54. (dissenting). It is important that trains run on time, but it is more important that the people and property of the state be kept safe.

¶ 55. The public safety of the residents of Wisconsin and our established tort law designed to promote public safety in Wisconsin do not necessarily conflict *524with federal standards under the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA), which "promote [s] safety in every area of railroad operations .. . ."1

¶ 56. Like the court of appeals, I recognize that the Federal Railroad Safety Act does not fully replace or supersede Wisconsin's tort law, which protects the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Partenfelder v. RohdeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API