Scott Partenfelder v. Steve Rohde
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.
¶ 54. (dissenting). It is important that trains run on time, but it is more important that the people and property of the state be kept safe.
¶ 55. The public safety of the residents of Wisconsin and our established tort law designed to promote public safety in Wisconsin do not necessarily conflict *524with federal standards under the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA), which "promote [s] safety in every area of railroad operations .. . ."1
¶ 56. Like the court of appeals, I recognize that the Federal Railroad Safety Act does not fully replace or supersede Wisconsin's tort law, which protects the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Partenfelder v. RohdeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013