Frances Hannon v. Marion Hannon and Michael Hannon
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this appeal from a judgment against the defendant-appellant in the amount of five thousand dollars we find oral argument unnecessary and summarily affirm.
The plaintiffs filed a complaint for libel against the defendant; jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship. On July 30, 1968 the parties agreed to a settlement in open court, which settlement was approved by the District Judge and recorded on the docket. The terms of the settlement provided that the defendant should convey certain property in the District of Columbia to the plaintiff Michael Hannon and pay the plaintiffs two…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Greenwood v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Hyman v. McLendonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Reed ex rel. Reed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Harry H. Foiles v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Alphonse T. Indrelunas, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Parker v. North Carolina Agricultural Finance AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Village of Kaktovik v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, North Slope Borough v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, National Wildlife Federation v. James G. Watt, in His Official Capacity as Secretary, U. S. Department of the Interior, Amoco Production Company, Intervenor-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.