Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Fluellen

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 17, 1994No. 93-0418; CMR No. 9102035Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Chief Judge

The granted issue in this case asks:

WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHERE CIVILIAN DEFENSE COUNSEL FAILED TO CONTACT AND CALL WITNESSES THAT WOULD HAVE PROVIDED AN ALIBI DEFENSE FOR APPELLANT AND CORROBORATED HIS TESTIMONY.

The two witnesses considered in the granted issue were the co-accused, Private Reynolds, and the owner of a pizzeria in the vicinity of the crime scene, Mr. Jannotta. They, along with appellant, subsequently testified at Private Reynolds’ court-martial, where he was found not guilty of robbery. Final Brief at 4.

Defense counsel in this case…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. Eddie L. Ayers, and Gregory R. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. State v. AplacaHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. United States v. Bruno MancariCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API