Legal Opinion

Stamford Extract Mfg. Co. v. Oakes Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 8, 1925No. 299PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, Circuit Judge.

This was an action at law for goods sold and delivered. The answer denied the sale and the plaintiff’s title, and set up five counterclaims, among them one upon the breach of a contract of sale because of the plaintiff’s default, demanding a return of part of certain sums paid on account and damages. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence the court dismissed the complaint, and eventually took a verdict on the counterclaim.

The contract was in writing, and consisted of two letters, of which the substantial parts are as follows:

First, from the plaintiff to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Kimberly v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Gourd v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Branhill Realty Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. Hass Bros. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  3. Anderson v. MercadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API