Legal Opinion

Buckley, Creedon & Danaher, Ex Rel. Bryant & Chapman Co. v. Woodward

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 4, 1937No. File #55093PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH (JOHN RUFUS), J.

The action is for an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the respondent as Dairy and Food Commissioner to grant to the relator a permit to import milk into Connecticut from a certain location known as the Dellwood area in the State of New York. The respondent moves to quash said writ for various reasons.

In the first place it is claimed that as the writ is not brought in the name of the State it is vitally defective. While it is true as pointed out in State vs. Towers, 71 Conn. 663; Thompson vs. Troup, 74 Cpnn. 121; State ex rel Rowland vs. Smith, 91 Conn., 110, 113,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. State Ex Rel. Rowland v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baumann v. Darhogopian, No. Cv 90 0267203 S (May 20, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
  2. Discepolo v. Johnson, No. 45132 (Nov. 25, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API