Legal Opinion

United States v. Bruce Robert Shampang

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1993No. 92-30047PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Chief Judge:

Shampang appeals from the district court’s revocation of his probation and imposition of a sentence of one year’s imprisonment on the grounds that he had possessed a controlled substance in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3565(a). Shampang contends that the district court erred in reading section 3565(a) to require mandatory revocation where the event triggering the revocation proceedings does not involve the use or possession of a controlled substance. Shampang also contends that the court’s reliance on distant violations for which his probation officer told him he would not be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Ronnie Dean HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Gary Lee WickhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Sherman Lee RiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Lawrence Michael DuffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Oscar Ullyses-SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Jose Hernandez SosaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. OmdahlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. LaChance v. RenoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Stinchfield v. MenifeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API