Legal Opinion

Meeker v. Kaelin

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington

Decided October 11, 1909No. 1,396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

At Eaiv. Ejectment by John Meeker and others against Martin Kaelin and others.

1Opinion of the Court

DONWORTH, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in this action were originally members of the Puyallup band or tribe of Indians, and are now citizens of the state of Washington by virtue of Act of Cong. Feb. 8, 1887, c. D9, 24 Stat. 388. The defendants are also citizens and residents of the state of Washington. The action is brought in this court as one arising under the laws of the United States and treaties made under their authority. Plaintiffs sue for possession of an undivided oue-lialf oí a tract of land situated in Pierce county, state of Washington, and described as the S. W. y4 of the S. W.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. McCune v. EssigSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Wilson v. WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Camp v. CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824
  5. Francis v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Little Joe's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. La Clair v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1910
  3. Vachon v. Nichols-Chisholm Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. KAN.District Court, D. Kansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API