Tromans v. Mahlman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County. W. E. Greene, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court and in the opinion rendered upon the fornier appeal, reported in 92 Cal. 1.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The facts in this case are set forth in the opinion given upon a former appeal. (Tromans v. Mahlman, 92 Cal. 1.) It was then held that the evidence was insufficient to show an actual residence upon the premises at the time of filing the declaration of homestead, and, consequently, that the premises were not impressed with the attributes of a homestead; and the case was remanded for a new trial. Upon that trial, from which the present appeal is taken, the evidence before the court was substantially the same as upon the former trial, and the decision of the court thereon in favor of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tromans v. MahlmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ellsworth v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Bell v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Johnston v. DebockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Lakas v. ArchambaultCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Wagner v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.