State v. McFarland
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
MARDEN, Justice.
On appeal. Upon conviction for breaking, entering and larceny appellant seasonably filed a motion for new trial based upon the usual grounds, with additional reasons as follows:
a) Error in denying appellant’s motion for acquittal.
b) Error in permitting cross-examination by the State of a State produced witness.
c) Error in the Court’s ruling that a State’s witness was a. hostile witness.
d) Error in refusing to give requested instructions to the jury.
e) Erroneous identity of the residence of the appellant, and
f) Error in a statement by the presiding Justice in the presence of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- United States v. JackskionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Heitfeld v. Benevolent & Protective Order of KeglersWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. BennerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
- State v. SabaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FournierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- State v. KnowlesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- State v. RusherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. MihillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- State v. WaiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.