Legal Opinion

State v. McFarland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 25, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARDEN, Justice.

On appeal. Upon conviction for breaking, entering and larceny appellant seasonably filed a motion for new trial based upon the usual grounds, with additional reasons as follows:

a) Error in denying appellant’s motion for acquittal.

b) Error in permitting cross-examination by the State of a State produced witness.

c) Error in the Court’s ruling that a State’s witness was a. hostile witness.

d) Error in refusing to give requested instructions to the jury.

e) Erroneous identity of the residence of the appellant, and

f) Error in a statement by the presiding Justice in the presence of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. United States v. JackskionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Heitfeld v. Benevolent & Protective Order of KeglersWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. BennerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
  5. State v. SabaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FournierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  2. State v. KnowlesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  3. State v. RusherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. MihillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  5. State v. WaiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API