Legal Opinion
Danielsen v. Security Van Lines, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 1963No. 898PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAMUEL, Judge.
Plaintiff has taken this appeal from a judgment dismissing his suit for workmen’s compensation. The defendants are his former employer, Security Van Lines, Inc., and its compensation insurer.
We find the facts, which are almost entirely undisputed, to be as follows: Plaintiff was employed by Security as a salesman-estimator. He was required to go to the premises of prospective customers and estimate Security’s charges for moving or storing the customers’ effects and, in addition, sold his employer’s services to persons he solicited and to those referred to him by Security. He was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Rosenquist v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Warren v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Long v. Hardware Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Brooks v. Cal-Metal Pipe Corp. of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Danielsen v. Security Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Danielsen v. Security Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963