Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hillman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1924No. Appeal, 72PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The plaintiff, Davis, entered into an agreement with Hillman, defendant, under the terms of which certain coal land in Washington County was to be acquired, and, in pursuance of the alleged understanding, bought it for the sum of $574,257.64, the necessary purchase money being advanced by the latter. It was claimed by the former that one-half of any profits which might accrue on a resale were to be paid to him. Hillman denied the existence of such an agreement, and suit was brought in 1921 to recover fifty per cent of the increase which it was averred could have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Consolidated National Bank v. McManusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Commonwealth v. MageeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Schuylkill Bank v. MacalesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. T. W. Phillips Gas and Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Sun Sales Corp. v. Block Land, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Stitt v. FeltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Sun Sales Corporation v. Block Land, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. Dove v. Thomas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Green County1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API