Legal Opinion

Stitt v. Felton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1939No. Appeals, 81 and 82PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The plaintiff originally brought a case in assumpsit against the defendant. An affidavit of defense was filed raising the legal question that the statement of claim included actions of trespass and assumpsit and were improperly joined in one suit. The learned court below sustained defendant’s position by granting leave to plaintiff to file a new statement of claim within thirty days. These two actions were thereafter instituted: one in trespass for the conversion of a funeral car and one in assumpsit for the accounting for its use by the defendant prior to the date of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Humbird v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Marys v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  3. Kline v. Jacobs & WifeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  4. Enterprise Oil v. National Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Browning v. CoverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BovairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Commonwealth v. BovairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Sigler v. Kingston National Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API