Legal Opinion

Mitchell County v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 28, 1926No. 5031PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The controlling question in this case is, whether or not the county authorities can expend money arising from the sale of bonds like those involved in this case, the proceeds of the sale of which were to be used “for the paving and grading of new and old roads in Mitchell County,” for the paving of certain streets in the City of Pelham. The streets in controversy were not a part of State-aid roads, but the plaintiffs in error submitted evidence to show they were parts of the public roads or the public-road system in Mitchell County. The showing upon this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gulf Paving Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Lee County v. Mayor of SmithvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Hayden v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Tate v. City of ElbertonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Almand v. Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aiken v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. State of Ga. v. Toll Bridge AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  3. Perkerson v. Mayor of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Leonard v. TALBERTSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  5. Myrick v. Brooks CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API