Legal Opinion

State v. Taft

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1996No. 13-94-434-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Chief Justice.

By one point of error the State appeals the trial court’s order granting appellee’s pretrial motion to suppress oral statements under evidence rule 403. Tex.R.Crim. Evid. 403. We reverse and remand.

The code of criminal procedure permits the State to appeal from an interlocutory order which grants a motion to suppress evidence. Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art 44.01(a)(5)(Vernon Supp.1996). The code provides, in pertinent part, “The state is entitled to appeal an order of a court in a criminal case if the order: grants a motion to suppress evidence, a confession, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tennard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Montalvo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. State v. Monroe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TaftCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API