Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Boston Scientific Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 29, 2024No. 1:23-cv-11986Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-11986-RGS MONA LISA HINTON v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT January 29, 2024 STEARNS, D.J. Boston Scientific Corporation designed, manufactured, marketed, and sold the Obtryx II Transobturator Mid-Urethral Sling System (the Product) to treat urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. A doctor surgically implanted the Product into plaintiff Mona Lisa Hinton on August 21, 2019. Less than two months later, the Product was explanted after…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. TamboneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Daigle v. Maine Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API