Legal Opinion
Clinco v. Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 2003No. 01-57089; D.C. No. CV-98-09263-FMCPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
In this diversity action, attorney Peter Clinco appeals pro se the district court’s judgment in favor of Dennis Roberts following a bench trial on Clinco’s intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo. Zivkovic v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1088 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.
The district court did not err by finding that Roberts’ conduct did not constitute IIED, or by relying on Cochran v. Cochran, 65 Cal.App.4th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Spero Saridakis v. United AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Cochran v. CochranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Kiseskey v. Carpenters' Trust for Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Thanh Quoc Nguyen Loi Pham Hien Van Tieu v. Southwest Leasing and Rental, Inc. Otium Corporation, Dba USA Rent-A-Car, and Yokohama Tire Corp. Yokohama Rubber Company Ltd., Thanh Quoc Nguyen Loi Pham Hien Van Tieu v. Southwest Leasing and Rental, Inc. Otium Corporation, Dba USA Rent-A-Car, and Yokohama Tire Corp. Yokohama Rubber Company Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002