Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 26, 2020No. 7:19-cv-00299Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT August 26, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk MCALLEN DIVISION OMA LEE ESPINOZA § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:19-cv-00299 § STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE § INSURANCE COMPANY, § § Defendant. § OPINION AND ORDER The Court now considers “Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability of the Underinsured Driver,”1 Defendant’s response,2 and Plaintiff’s reply.3 After considering the motion, record, and relevant authorities, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND This is an underinsured motorist…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API