Legal Opinion
Brennan v. Century Security Services
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 26, 2024No. 3:21-cv-01678Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMANDA BRENNAN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:21-CV-01678 v. (MEHALCHICK, J.) CENTURY SECURITY SERVICES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Presently before the Court are three motions in limine filed by Century Security Services (“Century”). (Doc. 63; Doc. 64; Doc. 66). Amanda Brennan (“Brennan”) initiated this action on September 29, 2021. (Doc. 1). Century’s motions in limine seek preclusion of evidence of back pay, front pay, economic loss lost wages and earnings, compensatory damages, and punitive damages (Doc. 63), evidence of dismissed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.