Legal Opinion

Barca v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County

Decided March 30, 1970No. 145Published

1Opinion of the Court

ACKER, J.,

This action in assumpsit has been tried nonjury. The verdict is in favor of defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Plaintiff, Dean M. Barca, is an employe of Sharon Steel Corporation and was continuously from 1963 through 1969, being the period in issue in this case.

2. As an employe of Sharon Steel Corporation, plaintiff and his wife, Fay A. Barca, were entitled to the benefits of Certificate No. 206-24-1020 with the Prudential Insurance Company of America.

3. In 1963, Fay A. Barca was under the care and treatment of Dr. Robert W. Monroe, a physician of Greenville, Pa., who referred her to Dr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Blue Anchor Overall Co. v. Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Miller v. Boston Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Sykes v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API