Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1998No. 97-2256Published

1ConcurrenceLundberg Stratton, J.

I concur with the majority opinion but write separately to explain further our decision to disbar the respondent.

*54In the past, this court has often incorporated rehabilitative measures into the conditions of discipline imposed upon the attorney whose abuse of alcohol and/or controlled substances has impacted upon one or more violations of the Disciplinary Rules. Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 302, 677 N.E.2d 1181; Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Baas (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 293, 681 N.E.2d 421; Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bell (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 88, 676 N.E.2d 527; Disciplinary Counsel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FortadoOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GoslingOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. NorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BaasOhio Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API