Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Barclays Bank PLC v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1996No. 1995-0274PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 536.] THE STATE EX REL. BARCLAYS BANK PLC ET AL. v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Barclays Bank PLC v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas,

1996-Ohio-286.] Prohibition—Presence of disagreement is insufficient to create an actual controversy if the parties to the action do not have adverse legal interests—Action to enjoin payment under letter of credit must include beneficiary as a party in order to present an actual controversy within court’s subject matter jurisdiction. 1.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State ex rel. Largent v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Department of Administrative Services v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Novak, L.L.P. v. Ambrose (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. M6 Motors, Inc. v. Nissan of N. Olmsted, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Fradette v. Gold (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council, Inc. v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In re Application for Correction of Birth Record of AdelaideOhio Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API