Dearing v. Reese
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ZEHMER, Judge.
Daniel Sears Dearing, Jr., the plaintiff below, appeals a directed verdict for the defendant Stuart Reese in this negligence action for breach of duty to provide Dear-ing a safe place to work. We reverse.
Viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences from the evidence in a light most favorable to Dearing, the record reflects the following facts. Reese, who has renovated and sold houses on several prior occasions, purchased a house in Tallahassee to renovate and resell. Subsequently, Dearing was hired to do general labor on the house. Dearing’s job was described as “basic labor”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. City of Pompano BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Yearty, Et Vir. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- McGee v. C. Ed. DeBrauwere & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Hicks v. KempSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. Of America v. McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hancock v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Benitez v. JOSEPH TRUCKING, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Gonzalez v. Seabest, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
- Iviricu v. VelascoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996