Legal Opinion

Yearty, Et Vir. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, at the beginning of his brief, states:

“1. Broadly it is sought by the appeal to have a reconsideration of the evidence with view. to reversal of the findings • disclosed by the final decree so that the questions for consideration will deal with sufficiency of evidence before the trial court to sustain the Chancellor in his decree.”

There appear nine other paragraphs of questions sought to be presented but the first question above quoted is the controlling factor in each of the other questions stated.

There is' disclosed in the record substantial evidence to support the final decree…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kamenesh v. City of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. Baker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Dearing v. ReeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. Of America v. McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API