Legal Opinion
SignalQuest v. Chou, et al
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided February 23, 2016No. Civil No. 11-cv-392-JLPublished
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SignalQuest, Inc. v. Civil No. 11-cv-392-JL Opinion No.
2016 DNH 035
Tien-Ming Chou, OneQue Corporation, and Bravotronics Corporation MEMORANDUM ORDER This patent infringement action relates to tilt and vibration sensors. Defendants Tien-Ming Chou, OncQue Corporation, and defendant and counter-claimant Bravotronics Corporation, have moved for summary judgment that the patents asserted in this action by plaintiff and counter-claim defendant SignalQuest, Inc.,1 are invalid and that Bravotronics does not infringe them. Specifically, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.