Legal Opinion
GARDNER v. SEPTA
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 17, 2019No. 2:17-cv-04476Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT GARDNER, : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 17-4476 : SEPTA, : Defendant. : OPINION Plaintiff, Robert Gardner, brought this action against his current employer, Defendant, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”), under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”). Plaintiff alleges that he is an individual with a disability for the purposes of the ADA and PHRA, and that Defendant violated his rights by not granting him a reasonable…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.